Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 2024 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38391878

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: In 2014, the College of American Pathologists developed an evidence-based guideline to address analytic validation of immunohistochemical assays. Fourteen recommendations were offered. Per the National Academy of Medicine standards for developing trustworthy guidelines, guidelines should be updated when new evidence suggests modifications. OBJECTIVE.­: To assess evidence published since the release of the original guideline and develop updated evidence-based recommendations. DESIGN.­: The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and update the original guideline recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. RESULTS.­: Two strong recommendations, 1 conditional recommendation, and 12 good practice statements are offered in this updated guideline. They address analytic validation or verification of predictive and nonpredictive assays, and recommended revalidation procedures following changes in assay conditions. CONCLUSIONS.­: While many of the original guideline statements remain similar, new recommendations address analytic validation of assays with distinct scoring systems, such as programmed death receptor-1 and analytic verification of US Food and Drug Administration approved/cleared assays; more specific guidance is offered for validating immunohistochemistry performed on cytology specimens.

2.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 146(10): 1194-1210, 2022 10 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35920830

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for patients with advanced solid tumors that have DNA mismatch repair defects or high levels of microsatellite instability; however, the FDA provided no guidance on which specific clinical assays should be used to determine mismatch repair status. OBJECTIVE.­: To develop an evidence-based guideline to identify the optimal clinical laboratory test to identify defects in DNA mismatch repair in patients with solid tumor malignancies who are being considered for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. DESIGN.­: The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. Using the National Academy of Medicine-endorsed Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, the recommendations were derived from available evidence, strength of that evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. Mismatch repair immunohistochemistry, microsatellite instability derived from both polymerase chain reaction and next-generation sequencing, and tumor mutation burden derived from large panel next-generation sequencing were within scope. RESULTS.­: Six recommendations and 3 good practice statements were developed. More evidence and evidence of higher quality were identified for colorectal cancer and other cancers of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract than for cancers arising outside the GI tract. CONCLUSIONS.­: An optimal assay depends on cancer type. For most cancer types outside of the GI tract and the endometrium, there was insufficient published evidence to recommend a specific clinical assay. Absent published evidence, immunohistochemistry is an acceptable approach readily available in most clinical laboratories.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Microsatellite Instability , Female , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Mismatch Repair/genetics , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Pathologists , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Systematic Reviews as Topic
3.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 146(5): 547-574, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35175291

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: The diagnosis and clinical management of patients with diffuse gliomas (DGs) have evolved rapidly over the past decade with the emergence of molecular biomarkers that are used to classify, stratify risk, and predict treatment response for optimal clinical care. OBJECTIVE.­: To develop evidence-based recommendations for informing molecular biomarker testing for pediatric and adult patients with DGs and provide guidance for appropriate laboratory test and biomarker selection for optimal diagnosis, risk stratification, and prediction. DESIGN.­: The College of American Pathologists convened an expert panel to perform a systematic review of the literature and develop recommendations. A systematic review of literature was conducted to address the overarching question, "What ancillary tests are needed to classify DGs and sufficiently inform the clinical management of patients?" Recommendations were derived from quality of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS.­: Thirteen recommendations and 3 good practice statements were established to guide pathologists and treating physicians on the most appropriate methods and molecular biomarkers to include in laboratory testing to inform clinical management of patients with DGs. CONCLUSIONS.­: Evidence-based incorporation of laboratory results from molecular biomarker testing into integrated diagnoses of DGs provides reproducible and clinically meaningful information for patient management.


Subject(s)
Glioma , Pathologists , Adult , Child , Humans , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Glioma/diagnosis , Glioma/genetics , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Systematic Reviews as Topic
4.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 143(10): 1180-1195, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30645156

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT.­: Advancements in genomic, computing, and imaging technology have spurred new opportunities to use quantitative image analysis (QIA) for diagnostic testing. OBJECTIVE.­: To develop evidence-based recommendations to improve accuracy, precision, and reproducibility in the interpretation of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) immunohistochemistry (IHC) for breast cancer where QIA is used. DESIGN.­: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) convened a panel of pathologists, histotechnologists, and computer scientists with expertise in image analysis, immunohistochemistry, quality management, and breast pathology to develop recommendations for QIA of HER2 IHC in breast cancer. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address 5 key questions. Final recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, expert panel consensus, and advisory panel review. RESULTS.­: Eleven recommendations were drafted: 7 based on CAP laboratory accreditation requirements and 4 based on expert consensus opinions. A 3-week open comment period received 180 comments from more than 150 participants. CONCLUSIONS.­: To improve accurate, precise, and reproducible interpretation of HER2 IHC results for breast cancer, QIA and procedures must be validated before implementation, followed by regular maintenance and ongoing evaluation of quality control and quality assurance. HER2 QIA performance, interpretation, and reporting should be supervised by pathologists with expertise in QIA.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted , Laboratories , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Female , Humans , Accreditation , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Evidence-Based Medicine , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/standards , Immunohistochemistry , Laboratories/standards , Pathologists , Quality Control , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Reproducibility of Results , Societies, Medical , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
6.
J Mol Diagn ; 20(2): 129-159, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29398453

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS: Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Genetic Testing , Lung Neoplasms , Patient Selection , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/immunology , Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase/genetics , Consensus , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Genetic Testing/methods , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Immunohistochemistry , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/genetics , Lung Neoplasms/immunology , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Mutation , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/metabolism , Protein-Tyrosine Kinases/genetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins/genetics , Proto-Oncogenes/genetics , Treatment Outcome , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
7.
J Thorac Oncol ; 13(3): 323-358, 2018 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29396253

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS: Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS: The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes (ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.


Subject(s)
Lung Neoplasms , Pathology, Molecular , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
8.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 142(3): 321-346, 2018 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29355391

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: - In 2013, an evidence-based guideline was published by the College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology to set standards for the molecular analysis of lung cancers to guide treatment decisions with targeted inhibitors. New evidence has prompted an evaluation of additional laboratory technologies, targetable genes, patient populations, and tumor types for testing. OBJECTIVE: - To systematically review and update the 2013 guideline to affirm its validity; to assess the evidence of new genetic discoveries, technologies, and therapies; and to issue an evidence-based update. DESIGN: - The College of American Pathologists, the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and the Association for Molecular Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the key questions and literature search terms, review abstracts and full articles, and draft recommendations. RESULTS: - Eighteen new recommendations were drafted. The panel also updated 3 recommendations from the 2013 guideline. CONCLUSIONS: - The 2013 guideline was largely reaffirmed with updated recommendations to allow testing of cytology samples, require improved assay sensitivity, and recommend against the use of immunohistochemistry for EGFR testing. Key new recommendations include ROS1 testing for all adenocarcinoma patients; the inclusion of additional genes ( ERBB2, MET, BRAF, KRAS, and RET) for laboratories that perform next-generation sequencing panels; immunohistochemistry as an alternative to fluorescence in situ hybridization for ALK and/or ROS1 testing; use of 5% sensitivity assays for EGFR T790M mutations in patients with secondary resistance to EGFR inhibitors; and the use of cell-free DNA to "rule in" targetable mutations when tissue is limited or hard to obtain.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Lung Neoplasms , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Pathology, Molecular , Protein Kinase Inhibitors , Humans , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Genetic Testing/methods , Genetic Testing/standards , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Molecular Targeted Therapy/methods , Pathology, Molecular/methods , Pathology, Molecular/standards , Patient Selection , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
9.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 142(5): 559-597, 2018 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29251996

ABSTRACT

Context Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a major cause of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas, and HPV (and/or surrogate marker p16) status has emerged as a prognostic marker that significantly impacts clinical management. There is no current consensus on when to test oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas for HPV/p16 or on which tests to choose. Objective To develop evidence-based recommendations for the testing, application, interpretation, and reporting of HPV and surrogate marker tests in head and neck carcinomas. Design The College of American Pathologists convened a panel of experts in head and neck and molecular pathology, as well as surgical, medical, and radiation oncology, to develop recommendations. A systematic review of the literature was conducted to address 6 key questions. Final recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment period feedback, and expert panel consensus. Results The major recommendations include (1) testing newly diagnosed oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients for high-risk HPV, either from the primary tumor or from cervical nodal metastases, using p16 immunohistochemistry with a 70% nuclear and cytoplasmic staining cutoff, and (2) not routinely testing nonsquamous oropharyngeal carcinomas or nonoropharyngeal carcinomas for HPV. Pathologists are to report tumors as HPV positive or p16 positive. Guidelines are provided for testing cytologic samples and handling of locoregional and distant recurrence specimens. Conclusions Based on the systematic review and on expert panel consensus, high-risk HPV testing is recommended for all new oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients, but not routinely recommended for other head and neck carcinomas.


Subject(s)
Papillomavirus Infections , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Humans , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck/virology , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
11.
J Mol Diagn ; 19(2): 187-225, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28185757

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS: Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented. Key Words: Molecular diagnostics; Gastrointestinal; Histology; Genetics; Oncology.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/mortality , Disease Management , Gene Frequency , Genomic Instability , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Mutation , Mutation Rate , Prognosis , Signal Transduction , Treatment Outcome , Systematic Reviews as Topic , Meta-Analysis as Topic
12.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 141(5): 625-657, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28165284

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: - To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. METHODS: - The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. RESULTS: - Twenty-one guideline statements were established. CONCLUSIONS: - Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms , ErbB Receptors , Pathology, Clinical , Pathology, Molecular , Humans , American Medical Association , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , DNA Mutational Analysis , ErbB Receptors/genetics , Evidence-Based Medicine , Genetic Testing , Mutation , Prognosis , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
13.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(13): 1453-1486, 2017 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28165299

ABSTRACT

Purpose Molecular testing of colorectal cancers (CRCs) to improve patient care and outcomes of targeted and conventional therapies has been the center of many recent studies, including clinical trials. Evidence-based recommendations for the molecular testing of CRC tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) -targeted therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens are warranted in clinical practice. The purpose of this guideline is to develop evidence-based recommendations to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing for CRC through a systematic review of the literature. Methods The American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), College of American Pathologists (CAP), Association for Molecular Pathology (AMP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help establish standard molecular biomarker testing, guide targeted therapies, and advance personalized care for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included over 4,000 articles was conducted to gather data to inform this guideline. Results Twenty-one guideline statements (eight recommendations, 10 expert consensus opinions and three no recommendations) were established. Recommendations Evidence supports mutational testing for genes in the EGFR signaling pathway, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize molecular testing for predictive and prognostic molecular biomarkers involve selection of assays, type of specimens to be tested, timing of ordering of tests and turnaround time for testing results. Additional information is available at: www.asco.org/CRC-markers-guideline and www.asco.org/guidelineswiki.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/genetics , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Humans
14.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 147(3): 221-260, 2017 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28165529

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To develop evidence-based guideline recommendations through a systematic review of the literature to establish standard molecular biomarker testing of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to guide epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) therapies and conventional chemotherapy regimens. Methods: The American Society for Clinical Pathology, College of American Pathologists, Association for Molecular Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to establish standard molecular biomarker testing and guide therapies for patients with CRC. A comprehensive literature search that included more than 4,000 articles was conducted. Results: Twenty-one guideline statements were established. Conclusions: Evidence supports mutational testing for EGFR signaling pathway genes, since they provide clinically actionable information as negative predictors of benefit to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody therapies for targeted therapy of CRC. Mutations in several of the biomarkers have clear prognostic value. Laboratory approaches to operationalize CRC molecular testing are presented.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Humans , Antibodies, Monoclonal/therapeutic use , Biomarkers, Tumor , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/therapy , ErbB Receptors , Systematic Reviews as Topic
15.
J Clin Oncol ; 35(4): 446-464, 2017 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28129524

ABSTRACT

Context ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA. Objectives To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making. Design The College of American Pathologists (CAP), American Society for Clinical Pathology (ASCP), and the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA. Results The Panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open comment participants. Recommendations The Panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and an HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance. Conclusion This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Biomarkers, Tumor , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophagogastric Junction , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/enzymology , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Algorithms , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Esophageal Neoplasms/enzymology , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophagogastric Junction/enzymology , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/analysis , Stomach Neoplasms/enzymology , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Systematic Reviews as Topic
16.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(12): 1345-1363, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27841667

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: - ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA. OBJECTIVES: - To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, to formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making. DESIGN: - The College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA. RESULTS: - The panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open-comment participants. RECOMMENDATIONS: - The panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and a HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance. CONCLUSIONS: - This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Esophageal Neoplasms , Evidence-Based Medicine , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Mutation , Receptor, ErbB-2 , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/metabolism , Adenocarcinoma/therapy , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biomarkers, Tumor/metabolism , Clinical Decision-Making , Combined Modality Therapy , Decision Trees , Diagnosis, Differential , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/metabolism , Esophageal Neoplasms/therapy , Medical Oncology/methods , Medical Oncology/trends , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Molecular Targeted Therapy , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Pathology, Clinical/methods , Pathology, Clinical/trends , Receptor, ErbB-2/antagonists & inhibitors , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Receptor, ErbB-2/metabolism , Societies, Medical , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/metabolism , Stomach Neoplasms/therapy , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
17.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(9): 932-49, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26905483

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: -There is ample evidence from the solid tumor literature that synoptic reporting improves accuracy and completeness of relevant data. No evidence-based guidelines currently exist for synoptic reporting for bone marrow samples. OBJECTIVE: -To develop evidence-based recommendations to standardize the basic components of a synoptic report template for bone marrow samples. DESIGN: -The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center convened a panel of experts in hematopathology to develop recommendations. A systematic evidence review was conducted to address 5 key questions. Recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS: -Nine guideline statements were established to provide pathology laboratories with a framework by which to develop synoptic reporting templates for bone marrow samples. The guideline calls for specific data groups in the synoptic section of the pathology report; provides a list of evidence-based parameters for key, pertinent elements; and addresses ancillary testing. CONCLUSION: -A framework for bone marrow synoptic reporting will improve completeness of the final report in a manner that is clear, succinct, and consistent among institutions.


Subject(s)
Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Laboratories/standards , Pathology, Clinical/standards , Research Report/standards , American Medical Association , Bone Marrow Examination/methods , Humans , Pathologists , Pathology, Clinical/methods , Pathology, Clinical/organization & administration , United States
18.
Am J Clin Pathol ; 146(6): 647-669, 2016 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28077399

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: ERBB2 (erb-b2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2 or HER2) is currently the only biomarker established for selection of a specific therapy for patients with advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, there are no comprehensive guidelines for the assessment of HER2 in patients with GEA. OBJECTIVES: To establish an evidence-based guideline for HER2 testing in patients with GEA, to formalize the algorithms for methods to improve the accuracy of HER2 testing while addressing which patients and tumor specimens are appropriate, and to provide guidance on clinical decision making. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists, American Society for Clinical Pathology, and American Society of Clinical Oncology convened an expert panel to conduct a systematic review of the literature to develop an evidence-based guideline with recommendations for optimal HER2 testing in patients with GEA. RESULTS: The panel is proposing 11 recommendations with strong agreement from the open-comment participants. RECOMMENDATIONS: The panel recommends that tumor specimen(s) from all patients with advanced GEA, who are candidates for HER2-targeted therapy, should be assessed for HER2 status before the initiation of HER2-targeted therapy. Clinicians should offer combination chemotherapy and a HER2-targeted agent as initial therapy for all patients with HER2-positive advanced GEA. For pathologists, guidance is provided for morphologic selection of neoplastic tissue, testing algorithms, scoring methods, interpretation and reporting of results, and laboratory quality assurance. CONCLUSIONS: This guideline provides specific recommendations for assessment of HER2 in patients with advanced GEA while addressing pertinent technical issues and clinical implications of the results.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/diagnosis , Clinical Decision-Making , Esophageal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Esophagogastric Junction/pathology , Receptor, ErbB-2/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Adenocarcinoma/drug therapy , Adenocarcinoma/genetics , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Esophageal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Esophageal Neoplasms/genetics , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Genetic Testing , Humans , Medical Oncology , Stomach Neoplasms/drug therapy , Stomach Neoplasms/genetics , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , United States
19.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 140(1): 29-40, 2016 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25965939

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Additional reviews of diagnostic surgical and cytology cases have been shown to detect diagnostic discrepancies. OBJECTIVE: To develop, through a systematic review of the literature, recommendations for the review of pathology cases to detect or prevent interpretive diagnostic errors. DESIGN: The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center in association with the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology convened an expert panel to develop an evidence-based guideline to help define the role of case reviews in surgical pathology and cytology. A literature search was conducted to gather data on the review of cases in surgical pathology and cytology. RESULTS: The panel drafted 5 recommendations, with strong agreement from open comment period participants ranging from 87% to 93%. The recommendations are: (1) anatomic pathologists should develop procedures for the review of selected pathology cases to detect disagreements and potential interpretive errors; (2) anatomic pathologists should perform case reviews in a timely manner to avoid having a negative impact on patient care; (3) anatomic pathologists should have documented case review procedures that are relevant to their practice setting; (4) anatomic pathologists should continuously monitor and document the results of case reviews; and (5) if pathology case reviews show poor agreement within a defined case type, anatomic pathologists should take steps to improve agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence exists that case reviews detect errors; therefore, the expert panel recommends that anatomic pathologists develop procedures for the review of pathology cases to detect disagreements and potential interpretive errors, in order to improve the quality of patient care.


Subject(s)
Cytodiagnosis , Diagnostic Errors , Pathology, Surgical , Humans , Cytodiagnosis/standards , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Laboratories/standards , Pathology, Surgical/standards , Systematic Reviews as Topic
20.
Arch Pathol Lab Med ; 139(12): 1515-24, 2015 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25897820

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: The labeling of paraffin blocks and microscopic glass slides in the practice of surgical pathology varies from institution to institution and introduces potential risk of preanalytic error. Currently there are no evidence-based guidelines regarding the uniform labeling of these materials. OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations that will address the need for adequate patient identification and provide a consistent method of identifying slides originating from a particular block. DESIGN: - The College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center and the National Society for Histotechnology convened a panel of pathologists and histotechnologists with expertise in histology laboratory quality practices to develop labeling recommendations. A systematic evidence review was conducted to address 6 main key questions. Recommendations were derived from strength of evidence, open comment feedback, and expert panel consensus. RESULTS: Twelve guideline statements were established to assist pathology laboratories in developing standardized block and slide labeling practices. These guidelines call for the use of 2 patient identifiers, 1 of which includes the accession number and case type, on all paraffin blocks and slides. Recommendations were also developed to address the order and format in which identifying elements should appear. CONCLUSIONS: Uniform labeling of paraffin blocks and slides derived from patient specimens will provide an important enhancement to patient safety by assuring that all preparations derived from a patient's tissue can be uniquely and unambiguously linked to that patient. Adoption of standardized practices additionally will improve patient care by facilitating interpretation of histologic sections when they are referred in consultation to a second institution.


Subject(s)
Histological Techniques , Laboratories , Pathology, Surgical , Staining and Labeling , Humans , Histological Techniques/methods , Histological Techniques/standards , Laboratories/standards , Pathology, Surgical/methods , Pathology, Surgical/standards , Societies, Medical , Staining and Labeling/methods , Staining and Labeling/standards , United States , Systematic Reviews as Topic
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...